HUM:Global Flagship Initiatives

Fanar Haddad, assistant professor in Arab Studies

Department of Cross-Cultural and Regional Studies

The project looks at the various ways in which Shia identity and forms of Shia belonging are imagined. In doing so, the project challenges the assumed binary between the national and the transnational. Though politically framed as mutually exclusive, the two categories are often mutually informing and reinforcing. As such, if Shia identity is imagined along a spectrum running from nationally embedded to globally-defined framings of Shiism, our approach considers not just the contradictions but the ambiguities and even the simultaneity between these various registers as well. The project will have six themes or work packages: 1. Shia identity and nationalism; 2. Diasporic Shiism; 3. Translocalism; 4. Shia material culture and imagined spaces of Shia; 5. Islamist actors; 6. Charity networks

Funding from HUM:Global would go towards organising an exploratory meeting that brings the core group together in Copenhagen to identify areas of immediate collaboration (joint papers and the like) and to plan a strategy for scaling up the project. A priority is to attract the necessary funding to turn the project into a major 3-5-year research project that includes collaboration and activities in Europe, the Middle East, South Asia and Southeast Asia. That way we can avoid a counterproductive fixation on the Middle East when discussing a demographic that extends far beyond it (the largest Shia populations outside Iran are in Pakistan and India).

The overarching theme of the project is intrinsically global and hence, from the outset, we are alert to the dangers of ghettoization that often mark area studies and Shia studies. To that end, we would explore comparative cases of globalized identities and communities (Jewish communities and Israel being an especially relevant case).

Haakon A. Ikonomou, assistant professor in Global History

The Saxo Institute

This Flagship Initiative aims to create a Centre for History, Strategy, and International Order (CHIOS) based jointly at the University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Humanities and at the Helmut-Schmidt-University, Hamburg. CHIOS would be focused on Northern Europe and the Baltic Sea Region as a geopolitical space in rapid transition - particularly after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine - understood in a European, Atlantic and Global context. A historical and humanities-based understanding of how our current international (dis)order emerged, which systems and ideas of order have been prevalent and germane over the last centuries; and which technologies and infrastructures of ordering – instruments and languages of governance – that have been built and reformed across historical ruptures is needed.

Concretely, we propose a centre built up around three thematic pillars: (I) International Orders: between regional and global; (II) Strategic Conceptualizations of Order; (III) Technologies and Infrastructures of Ordering. Cutting across these thematic pillars, we are interested in historically informed knowledge production and a strategic policy interphase on (a) innovations, (b) implementations and (c) the resilience of international orders in the 19th, 20th and 21st centuries. Accordingly, the centre is not only interested in how our currently embattled international (dis)order and our Northern European region withstand pressures, defend values, or safeguard interests, but equally in processes of renewal, realignment, and commitment to new international orders in the making – historically and today.

Partnership: HUM:Global, CEMES, 4EU+ at the University of Copenhagen & the Helmut Schmidt University.

Jun Liu, associate professor, Center for Tracking and Society

Department of Communications

This Flagship Initiative aims to advance our understanding of global digital platforms beyond those dominant, familiar ones to explore and interrogate a wider range of alternative platforms and their facilitation of our social, cultural, political, and economic interactions and exchanges. It asks questions about alternative platforms that we typically ask of major corporate platforms: Which kinds of alternative platforms are being employed by which groups of users, and for what purposes? What socio-political and economic contexts drive the adoption of these platforms? Or, under which circumstances are specific actors drawn to the affordances and functionalities of less well-known alternative platforms? What new (alternative) forms of engagement, influence, and politics emerge on these alternative platforms?

The initiative will further four key issues as follows. First, by identifying and acknowledging alternative platforms, we seek to understand diverse, localized, and contextualized adoption of communication technologies in a rapidly evolving digital landscape. Second, this initiative not only engages with several global themes, opportunities, and challenges but also anticipates emerging issues related to digital platforms. Our research takes a critical perspective on the power of big tech. Additionally, our initiative will consider the implications of these platforms for global inequality and access. Third, cross-departmental collaboration brings together a wealth of knowledge and expertise, including insights into the social and spatial mobilities of people, media use and appropriation, and the political economy of culture. This interdisciplinary approach equips our team to unpack the complexities and under-studied issues surrounding alternative media and politics. Fourth, collaborating with organizations and practitioners outside the academic sphere will provide us with practical insights and real-world applications.

The initiative consists of three types of activities (a) we will map out alternative platforms globally and build a database of academic literature on these platforms. (b) we will organize two to three talks involving the group members across departments, as well as partnerships with organizations beyond academia like International Media Support (IMS). These events will investigate the key questions addressed in the initiative and will cover a range of country cases, including those from the Global South and other understudied contexts. (c) Third, we will refine and further develop this proposal to seek larger funding opportunities.

Team members: Elena Meyer-Clement, Associate Professor, Department of Cross-Cultural and Regional Studies (ToRS) Lotte Pelckmans, Associate Professor, Centre for Advanced Migration Studies (AMIS)

Georg Walter Wink, associate professor, Centre for the Study of Nationalism

Department of English, German and Romance Studies

This Flagship Initiative is based at UCPH’s Centre for the Study of Nationalism. The objective is to strengthen the investigation of far-right ideologies by exploring their still less known traditionalist and religious-spiritual dimensions.

Previous research has shown that these tend to oppose “degenerated” Western progress and modernity but not how these tendencies manifest themselves beyond the European and US contexts and in relation to Anti-Western decoloniality. In a new approach and building on the area and language expertise of the Centre’s researchers as well as international collaborators, the project focuses on regions such as Latin America, Turkey, the Middle East and South/Southeast Asia. Research will scrutinize the far right’s antimodernist canon to find out how in each context these texts are received, appropriated, reinterpreted, transformed and how they draw on religious and other traditions. Based on this, researchers will analyze the metapolitical strategies and techniques (including the use of social media) through which these ideologies are promoted as well as examine the transfer of ideas through intellectual networks of far-right ideologues in and between these regions.

During the academic year 2025/2026, the project will consolidate and expand the research group with support of an advisory board. Through invited expert talks, seminars and internal workshops this new network will create awareness for the topic of “globalized Anti-Modernism”, explore and delimit this broad field, elaborate a research plan and identify funding opportunities.